On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:52:50 -0500 Nathan Fontenot <nf...@austin.ibm.com> wrote:
> Update the 'phys_index' properties of a memory block to include a > 'start_phys_index' which is the same as the current 'phys_index' property. > This also adds an 'end_phys_index' property to indicate the id of the > last section in th memory block. > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nf...@austin.ibm.com> No, please remain "phys_index" as it is. please don't rename it. IMHO, just adding end_phys_index is better. please avoid interface change AFAP. Do you have a problem if phys_index means start_phys_index ? Thanks, -Kame _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
