From: Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:20:42 +0200

> Le vendredi 16 juillet 2010 à 11:56 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> 
>> [PATCH] ehea: ehea_get_stats() should use GFP_KERNEL
>> 
>> ehea_get_stats() is called in process context and should use GFP_KERNEL
>> allocation instead of GFP_ATOMIC.
>> 
>> Clearing stats at beginning of ehea_get_stats() is racy in case of
>> concurrent stat readers.
>> 
>> get_stats() can also use netdev net_device_stats, instead of a private
>> copy.
>> 
>> Reported-by: divya <dipra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/ehea/ehea.h      |    1 -
>>  drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c |    6 ++----
>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> 
>> 
> 
> Hmm, net-next-2.6 contains following patch :

If people think ehea usage is ubiquitous enough to deserve a backport
of this to net-2.6, fine.  But personally I don't think it's worth it.

Can someone close the kernel bugzilla 16406 created for this bug?  This
patch we have already obviously would fix this issue.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to