On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 13:18 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 01:08:23PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > - stw%U0%X0 %L2,%1" > > > - : "=m" (*ptep), "=m" (*((unsigned char *)ptep+4)) > > > + stw%U1%X1 %L2,%1" > > > + : "=m<>" (*ptep), "=m<>" (*((unsigned char *)ptep+4)) > > > : "r" (pte) : "memory"); > > > > This still isn't correct -- the constraint says that a byte > > is written, but the insn changes a word. Probably should just > > be ptep[1] ?
Oops, almost forgot about this. Are you guys shooting a new patch or do you want me to do it ? Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
