Am 27.06.2010 um 13:53 schrieb Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com>:

On 06/27/2010 02:49 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:

Am 27.06.2010 um 12:59 schrieb Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com>:

On 06/27/2010 01:33 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Or inc/dec...


Uh - huh? How would that help?

inc shared->critical   # disable interrupts

There is no opcode in the ppc isa that acts on momery without involving a register.

An inc would be:

ld rX, A(0)
addi rX, rX, 1
std rX, A(0)

Right, I was agreeing with you. I meant there was no inc/dec mem insns.

Ah, I see :). I think that's really the only point where I deem the x86 isa superior :).

Alex

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to