On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:14:02PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Any reason we need to differenciate between COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE and > ARCH_COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE? We don't need this for native system calls, > so I can't see the reason to do it for compat system calls. >
I think we wanted that to keep the sys32_ prefixed based naming, to avoid collisions with generic compat handler names. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
