Grant Likely wrote:
I also changed the property in the cpu nodes from model to compatible so that the exact CPU version can be specified. This isn't actually in any spec anywhere, but I need something to properly identify the different ARM cores. Mitch, I know you were working on a draft ARM binding a while ago, have you resurrected it at all?
As it turns out, today I re-began ARM OFW work in earnest, after a hiatus of something like 10 years.
I haven't thought much about a binding yet. I'm still getting my head around the current state of the ARM art.
How do you think the core should be identified?
When I was last working on ARM, few ARM devices had enough resources to run a general purpose OS. To first approximation, StrongARM was the only game in town - so there wasn't much need to address the identification question.
It seems that many of the differences at the CPU level can be determined by looking at "coprocessor" registers. For what purpose(s) do we need to identify the core? That will inform our choice of a core ID schema.
Cheers, g.
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
