On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 10:46 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > It shouldn't need any fixing because I'm not touching the driver side > of the equation (unlike the last breakage where macio_driver had its > own copy of the match table which I missed). In fact, there aren't > even any logic changes other than dealing with moving some of the > structure members in the sparc arch code. If I did miss anything, > then it should show up in build testing.
Ok, but I though you were actually replacing occurences of "of_device" with "platform_device", and so was wondering why you aren't changing the ones in macio. But yes, the #define you did might do the trick as long as the resources are still named the same etc... Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
