On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Mark Brown <broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote: > On 10 Jun 2010, at 23:07, Grant Likely wrote: > >> To me, this seems firmly in the realm of silicon bug workaround. >> Considering that the pins aren't relocatable (ie, the GPIO numbers >> never change), I've got no problem having the GPIO reset logic added >> to arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx and hard coding the GPIO numbers. > > Since the pins are fixed I agree - I was assuming that the DT updates > were there because there were multiple pin mux options for the AC'97 > controller so we needed the DT to say which were in use on the board.
:-) I originally also made the same assumption, until I actually went and looked at the data sheet. g. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
