> The patch looks okay to me. > > BTW, where is the i8042 binding documented? Ben, is this location of > the kbd/mouse irq historical, or is it just something that we happened > to get when the .dts files were first created? Having the irq > specified directly in the kbd or aux nodes would make a lot more > sense, and if this isn't something already nailed down, then it > probably does make sense to move the irq specification, fall back to > the parent node to still support older trees, and with the hard coded > irq numbers as the last resort.
That's just ISA crap. It should be in the existing OF bindings. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
