On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:31 AM, Vivek Mahajan wrote: > Signed-off-by: Vivek Mahajan <vivek.maha...@freescale.com> > --- > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p2020rdb.dts | 6 ++++++ > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p2020rdb.dts > b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p2020rdb.dts > index da4cb0d..8a26050 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p2020rdb.dts > +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p2020rdb.dts > @@ -583,4 +583,10 @@ > 0x0 0x100000>; > }; > }; > + > + cache-s...@fff00000 { > + fsl,cache-sram-ctlr-handle = <&L2>; > + reg = <0 0xfff00000 0 0x10000>; > + compatible = "fsl,p2020-cache-sram"; > + }; > }; > -- > 1.5.6.5
Sorry, we've let this sit too long: This should be created by u-boot instead of static in the .dts. The assumption should be the cache/SRAM is already setup this way via u-boot and its just conveying the HW config to the kernel. In the future we should have the kernel dynamically allocate a physical address region for the SRAM (if its not already setup by u-boot). - k _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev