On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 03:46:04PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: [Reflowed into 80 columns; please fix your mail client.]
> > (I've omitted the DMA nodes and some irrelevant details) This is > > enough information for a simplistic driver registration that probably > > makes a lot of assumptions. Such as the ssi represents a single > > logical sound device. It won't handle complex representations, but in > Why would I ever represent the SSI as anything but a single logical > sound device? Let ALSA handle synchronizing multiple streams together > if it wants to. ... > > dai-links = <&ssi1 0 &codec 0 > > &ssi1 1 &codec 1>; > > [...] > I don't know when I would ever do this. The two SSI devices are > completely independent. Why would I bind them together into one > "device"? It's entirely possible that if the board designer intended the verious SSIs to be used in concert they've done something like cross wire the clocks which creates a board-specific interrelationship that needs to be dealt with. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
