On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 14:39 +0900, Kenji Kaneshige wrote: > > > Yes, with these lines removed bridge memory window is properly > allocated. > > These lines are to prevent updating IO or memory windows when there > are > some devices working behind the bridge. So please note that removing > these lines is just for debugging.
This is not a very good way to do so though. Many firmwares will leave those enabled even when the bridges -do- have to be reconfigured. Worse... the code means that the kernel -will- have updated its resource tree, probably assigned new resources, etc... to those bridges, and thus to devices underneath them, but will silently fail to actually update the bridge BARs to match. This seems like a major bug to me in fact. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
