On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 23:32:36 +0300
Anton Vorontsov <avoront...@ru.mvista.com> wrote:
> This patch implements GPIOLIB notifier hooks, and thus makes device-enabled
> GPIO chips (i.e. the ones that have gpio_chip->dev specified) automatically
> attached to the OpenFirmware subsystem. Which means that now we can handle
> I2C and SPI GPIO chips almost* transparently.
>
> ...
>
> +static int of_gpiochip_register_simple(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> + struct device_node *np)
Why is this called "register_simple" but the unregistration function
isn't called "unregister_simple"?
> +{
> + struct of_gpio_chip *of_gc;
> +
> + if (np->data) {
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + of_gc = kzalloc(sizeof(*of_gc), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!of_gc)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + of_gc->gpio_cells = 2;
> + of_gc->xlate = of_gpio_simple_xlate;
> + of_gc->chip = chip;
> + np->data = of_gc;
> + of_node_get(np);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_gpiochip_register_simple);
Makes no sense to export a static symbol and to provide no declaration
of it in a .h file. I assume the export was unintended.
My plot is somewhat lost. Grant, could you please summarise in
easy-for-akpm-to-understand terms what your issues are with this
patchset and how you think we should proceed?
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
