Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de> wrote on 2010/03/08 08:46:29: > > Hello Joakim, > > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > [...] > > What would be interesting is to skip patch 3 and turn off > > MODULES add PIN_TLB and compare that against your unpatched .33 but > > with MODULES off and PIN_TLB on > > run version > > 1-4 Linux2.6.33-rc without module support and PIN_TLB=on > 5-8 Linux2.6.33-rc without module support and PIN_TLB=on + patches 1,2,4 > > L M B E N C H 3 . 0 S U M M A R Y > ------------------------------------ > (Alpha software, do not distribute)
hmm, these results varies a lot. The only stable result I can see is: > Memory latencies in nanoseconds - smaller is better > (WARNING - may not be correct, check graphs) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Host OS Mhz L1 $ L2 $ Main mem Rand mem Guesses > --------- ------------- --- ---- ---- -------- -------- ------- > tqm8xx Linux 2.6.33- 66 31.7 183.2 184.0 1163.0 No L2 > cache? > tqm8xx Linux 2.6.33- 66 31.7 183.2 184.0 1164.8 No L2 > cache? > tqm8xx Linux 2.6.33- 66 31.7 183.2 184.0 1163.2 No L2 > cache? > tqm8xx Linux 2.6.33- 66 31.7 183.2 183.8 1163.7 No L2 > cache? > tqm8xx Linux 2.6.33- 66 31.8 172.4 173.2 1147.3 No L2 > cache? > tqm8xx Linux 2.6.33- 66 31.8 172.5 173.2 1148.3 No L2 > cache? > tqm8xx Linux 2.6.33- 66 31.8 172.5 173.1 1146.9 No L2 > cache? > tqm8xx Linux 2.6.33- 66 31.8 172.5 173.2 1147.3 No L2 > cache? I don't see why the other results vary so much. Are you using NFS or having much network traffic? Jocke _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev