Alexandre Bounine wrote:
/** + * rio_em_set_ops- Sets Error Managment operations for a particular vendor switch + * @rdev: RIO device + * + * Searches the RIO EM ops table for known switch types. If the vid + * and did match a switch table entry, then set the em_init() and + * em_handle() ops to the table entry values.
Shouldn't any RIO device be able to support error management, not just switches?
+/** + * rio_pw_enable - Enables/disables port-write handling by a master port + * @port: Master port associated with port-write handling + * @enable: 1=enable, 0=disable + */ +static void rio_pw_enable(struct rio_mport *port, int enable) +{ + if (port->ops->pwenable) + port->ops->pwenable(port, enable); +} +
Maybe this can be done by switch->init function?
+/** + * rio_inb_pwrite_handler - process inbound port-write message + * @pw_msg: pointer to inbound port-write message + * + * Processes an inbound port-write message. Returns 0 if the request + * has been satisfied. + */ +int rio_inb_pwrite_handler(u32 *pw_msg) +{
Perhaps map this pw_msg to a struct? Or read it into named variables?
+ /* Clear Port Errors */ + rio_mport_write_config_32(mport, destid, hopcount, + rdev->phys_efptr + RIO_PORT_N_ERR_STS_CSR(portnum), + err_status & 0x07120204);
Hardcoded value!
+ + if (rdev->rswitch->port_ok & (1 << portnum)) { + if (err_status & RIO_PORT_N_ERR_STS_PORT_UNINIT) { + rdev->rswitch->port_ok &= ~(1 << portnum); + rio_mport_read_config_32(mport, destid, hopcount, + rdev->phys_efptr + RIO_PORT_N_CTL_CSR(portnum), + ®val); + rio_mport_write_config_32(mport, destid, hopcount, + rdev->phys_efptr + RIO_PORT_N_CTL_CSR(portnum), + regval | RIO_PORT_N_CTL_LOCKOUT);
You have a function for this?
+ rio_mport_write_config_32(mport, destid, hopcount, + rdev->phys_efptr + + RIO_PORT_N_ACK_STS_CSR(portnum), + RIO_PORT_N_ACK_CLEAR);
This doesn't work for the 568; but the 568 has no special handling?
+ /* Clear Port-Write Pending bit */ + rio_mport_write_config_32(mport, destid, hopcount, + rdev->phys_efptr + RIO_PORT_N_ERR_STS_CSR(portnum), + RIO_PORT_N_ERR_STS_PW_PEND); +DECLARE_RIO_EM_OPS(RIO_VID_TUNDRA, RIO_DID_TSI572, tsi57x_em_init, tsi57x_em_handler); +DECLARE_RIO_EM_OPS(RIO_VID_TUNDRA, RIO_DID_TSI574, tsi57x_em_init, tsi57x_em_handler); +DECLARE_RIO_EM_OPS(RIO_VID_TUNDRA, RIO_DID_TSI577, tsi57x_em_init, tsi57x_em_handler); +DECLARE_RIO_EM_OPS(RIO_VID_TUNDRA, RIO_DID_TSI578, tsi57x_em_init, tsi57x_em_handler);
Why not declare these along with the other ops? Micha _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev