On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:40:34AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: >> In the off chance that someone actually does an SMP 44x, I think the hint bit >> here would just be ignored (I could test possibly if we want to verify). >> However, I thought the FSL parts didn't like toggling the reserved bits and >> those already are SMP in some cases. >> >> Kumar? >> >> josh > >Yeah, I need to test this on some older SMP parts that didn't treated reserved >bits being set in the opcode as ignored but illegal.
It looks like Anton just did a v2 of the patch targeted at ppc64 instead. josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
