On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 21:58 +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:

> Index: linux-cpumask/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-cpumask.orig/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h     2010-01-12 
> 12:36:47.174226189 +1100
> +++ linux-cpumask/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h  2010-01-12 
> 12:36:47.432976459 +1100
> @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@
>  
>  typedef struct {
>       unsigned int __softirq_pending;
> +#if defined(CONFIG_XICS) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> +     unsigned long xics_ipi;
> +#endif
>  } ____cacheline_aligned irq_cpustat_t;

This is still a gross abuse of irq_cpustat_t ... Can't we do
a separate DECLARE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(unsigned long, xics_ipi)
inside xics.c instead ?

Cheers,
Ben.

>  DECLARE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(irq_cpustat_t, irq_stat);
> Index: linux-cpumask/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/xics.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-cpumask.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/xics.c  2010-01-12 
> 12:36:46.905477650 +1100
> +++ linux-cpumask/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/xics.c       2010-01-12 
> 12:40:54.782975198 +1100
> @@ -514,15 +514,12 @@ static void __init xics_init_host(void)
>  /*
>   * XICS only has a single IPI, so encode the messages per CPU
>   */
> -struct xics_ipi_struct {
> -        unsigned long value;
> -     } ____cacheline_aligned;
> -
> -static struct xics_ipi_struct xics_ipi_message[NR_CPUS] __cacheline_aligned;
>  
>  static inline void smp_xics_do_message(int cpu, int msg)
>  {
> -     set_bit(msg, &xics_ipi_message[cpu].value);
> +     unsigned long *tgt = &(per_cpu(irq_stat, cpu).xics_ipi);
> +
> +     set_bit(msg, tgt);
>       mb();
>       if (firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_LPAR))
>               lpar_qirr_info(cpu, IPI_PRIORITY);
> @@ -548,25 +545,23 @@ void smp_xics_message_pass(int target, i
>  
>  static irqreturn_t xics_ipi_dispatch(int cpu)
>  {
> +     unsigned long *tgt = &(per_cpu(irq_stat, cpu).xics_ipi);
> +
>       WARN_ON(cpu_is_offline(cpu));
>  
>       mb();   /* order mmio clearing qirr */
> -     while (xics_ipi_message[cpu].value) {
> -             if (test_and_clear_bit(PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNCTION,
> -                                    &xics_ipi_message[cpu].value)) {
> +     while (*tgt) {
> +             if (test_and_clear_bit(PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNCTION, tgt)) {
>                       smp_message_recv(PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNCTION);
>               }
> -             if (test_and_clear_bit(PPC_MSG_RESCHEDULE,
> -                                    &xics_ipi_message[cpu].value)) {
> +             if (test_and_clear_bit(PPC_MSG_RESCHEDULE, tgt)) {
>                       smp_message_recv(PPC_MSG_RESCHEDULE);
>               }
> -             if (test_and_clear_bit(PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE,
> -                                    &xics_ipi_message[cpu].value)) {
> +             if (test_and_clear_bit(PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE, tgt)) {
>                       smp_message_recv(PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE);
>               }
>  #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUGGER) || defined(CONFIG_KEXEC)
> -             if (test_and_clear_bit(PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK,
> -                                    &xics_ipi_message[cpu].value)) {
> +             if (test_and_clear_bit(PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK, tgt)) {
>                       smp_message_recv(PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK);
>               }
>  #endif


_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to