On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 00:48 +0200, Felix Radensky wrote: > > Maybe because the bus behind root P2P bridge is bus 0, and type 1 > cycles are > needed for bus numbers greater than 0. That's what 460EX manual says.
Well, no... the bus behind the root P2P is bus 1 ... the root P2P itself is on bus 0... but then, it's some trick in the way they implemented it I suppose. > You are correct, the log is from older version, without Stef's fix. I > don't have access to a > system with devices behind PLX, and the guy who did the testing used > wrong kernel. > I'll make sure he uses the correct one and get back to you. Maybe > everything works after all :) > I'm really sorry for confusion. No worries :-) Feel free to send a proper patch to fix that problem upstream too ! Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
