On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 03:10:20PM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > From: Wolfgang Grandegger <w...@denx.de> > > The main differences compared to the MSCAN on the MPC5200 are: > > - More flexibility in choosing the CAN source clock and frequency: > > Three different clock sources can be selected: "ip", "ref" or "sys". > For the latter two, a clock divider can be defined as well. If the > clock source is not specified by the device tree, we first try to > find an optimal CAN source clock based on the system clock. If that > is not possible, the reference clock will be used. > > - The behavior of bus-off recovery is configurable: > > To comply with the usual handling of Socket-CAN bus-off recovery, > "recovery on request" is selected (instead of automatic recovery). > > Note that only MPC5121 Rev. 2 and later is supported. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <w...@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <w.s...@pengutronix.de> It still works with our board and I didn't find anything else to comment on. Thanks, Wolfgang! -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
