On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 20:48 +0100, Albert Herranz wrote: > > This -1 should be NO_IRQ too. > I'll fix this in the next version.
No. The number you pass here is not a linux virq number, but a number in your HW numbering space that never represents a valid IRQ. In your case 0 (NO_IRQ is deprecated anyways) is a valid HW interrupt number. However -1 sounds good. So your existing code is fine. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
