On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 01:09 +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >>> We need it as it currently doesn't match with the default bus ids. > >> > >>> Should I introduce a .type property matching any of those above > >>> in the > >>> soc node, and get rid of the explicit bus probe? > >> > >> You don't need any fake bus as far as I can see, just probe the > >> devices > >> you want. > > > > But it's way easier to let the bus probe do it for us. I don't see > > the win here. > > As long as this doesn't leak into the device tree in any way, I don't > care. How's that? :-)
I still like having the node that encloses all the devices. Not sure why, but I like it :-) Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
