On 11/26/2009 03:16 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:

You can keep pvr out of the (named) union.

So we'd have

sregs.padded.ppc64.slb?


or sregs.u.ppc64.slb.

I don't see how that is an improvement.

Buildability takes precedence.

(an alternative is to drop the union, and add a BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof...)).

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to