On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Wolfram Sang <w.s...@pengutronix.de> wrote: >> up patch 3. Â BUT, you're on my shit list. Â Patch 2 in your series > > Huh, are you in a bad mood today? IMHO he addressed some valid issues; and we > all had to start somewhere regarding the workflow. I know that manually > adapting patches is annoying, but this wording sounds quite strong...
Albrecht has been around for a bit now. He does good work, responds to comments, and in general shows good taste. This particular case was just a bit sloppy. The patch was damaged on the mailing list and it conflicted with his other patches. I know he knows better. Albrecht, I'm not actually mad at you, and I'm sorry for the harsh working. The patch series is good work. I wouldn't have picked it up if it was otherwise. I'm just a little annoyed about something I know you can handle better. I don't bear any ill will. Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
