On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 02:25:15PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > Anton Vorontsov wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 02:03:14PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > >>Kumar Gala wrote: > >>>On Nov 5, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > >>>>As for patch 3, Ben objected to the sleep-nexus stuff on IRC. > >>>Is sleep-nexus new? I thought we've had that for a bit. > >>It's been around in a few dts files, but as was noted, nothing uses > >>this stuff yet. > > > >So I should just drop the sleep-nexus changes? I can also > >prepare a patch that removes sleep-nexus from 8313rdb.dts. > >But how should we handle the sleep = <> properties then? > > We could still have some sort of nexus node that is off to the side > (pointed to with sleep-parent) and not inserting itself into the > hierarchy. > > Or, we could allow multiple nodes to refer to the same sleep ID, and > use the ID rather than a node to tie things together. If we do > that, we'll probably want a simple index rather than a set of bits > in the sleep property, so it can correspond to some kernel object > that has some bookeeping info. Perhaps we could tie into the clock > bindings that were discussed on devtree-discuss in August.
Yeah, reusing the clk api would be the best. Anyway, since we don't use the sleep-nexus stuff, I'd rather just add the power management controller nodes. -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmai...@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
