> On Friday 30 October 2009 15:50:22 Jonathan Haws wrote: > > > I suspect that the msync() was merely serving as a very > heavyweight > > > memory barrier. > > > > I did try hacking the mb() calls from the kernel source to use > them in user space, but they had no effect. I still had to include > the calls to msync(). > > What did the resulting mb() that you used look like?
asm("eieio; sync"); _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev