On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:54:14AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:17:14AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > The matching logic returns a clock even if only the dev-part matches. This > > is > > wrong as devices may utilize more than one clock, so the wrong clock may be > > returned due to dev being not unique (noticed while working on the CAN > > driver). > > The proposed new method will: > > > - require the id field (as _this_ is the unique identifier) > > NULL id fields are supposed to be supported in the cannonical clkdev > API, unfortunately.
Hmm, ok, thanks for the hint. Where is this documented, I can't find it? -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
