On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Michal Simek <mon...@monstr.eu> wrote: > > > Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi Grant, >> >> Just first obvious thing: >> >> On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:30:59 -0600 Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca> >> wrote: >>> diff --git a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/prom.h >>> b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/prom.h >>> index 64e8b3a..5f461f0 100644 >>> --- a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/prom.h >>> +++ b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/prom.h >>> @@ -17,20 +17,10 @@ >>> #ifndef _ASM_MICROBLAZE_PROM_H >>> #define _ASM_MICROBLAZE_PROM_H >>> #ifdef __KERNEL__ >>> - >>> -/* Definitions used by the flattened device tree */ >>> -#define OF_DT_HEADER 0xd00dfeed /* marker */ >> >> This is used in arch/microblaze/kernel/head.S, but you move its >> definition inside "#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__" below. You should probably >> replace the include of asm/prom.h in arch/microblaze/kernel/head.S with >> linux/of_fdt.h (assuming that the comment in there is correct). > > yes, Stephen is right here. I created one patch (in attachment) which fixed > it. I tested your > patches on Microblaze (noMMU and MMU) and I have no problem with compilation > and simple boot-up > works for both versions too. > > With that my patch: Acked-by: Michal Simek <mon...@monstr.eu>
Thanks. I'll merge your change with my patch so that bisect isn't broken. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
