---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:37:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert.uytterhoe...@sonycom.com> To: Linux Test Project <ltp-l...@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: [LTP] mmapstress03 weirdness?
On ppc64, with 32-bit userland, I get: | Running tests....... | <<<test_start>>> | tag=mmapstress03 stime=1253117251 | cmdline="mmapstress03" | contacts="" | analysis=exit | <<<test_output>>> | incrementing stop | : errno = 0: really large mmap didn't fail | mmapstress03 1 TFAIL : Test failed ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | <<<execution_status>>> | initiation_status="ok" | duration=0 termination_type=exited termination_id=0 corefile=no | cutime=0 cstime=0 | <<<test_end>>> | INFO: ltp-pan reported all tests PASS ^^^^ The core part of this test is: /* Ask for a ridiculously large mmap region at a high address */ if (mmap((caddr_t)(1UL << (POINTER_SIZE - 1)) - pagesize, (size_t)((1UL << (POINTER_SIZE - 1)) - pagesize), PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_FIXED|MAP_SHARED, 0, 0) != (caddr_t)-1) { ERROR("really large mmap didn't fail"); anyfail(); } if (errno != ENOMEM && errno != EINVAL) { ERROR("really large mmap didn't set errno = ENOMEM nor EINVAL"); anyfail(); } With 32-bit userland, this boils down to: | mmap addr 0x7fff0000 size 0x7fff0000 | mmap returned 0x7fff0000 i.e. mmap() succeeds, but (1) the test expects it to fail, so the test returns TFAIL, but (2) ltp-pan still reports that the tests passed? In addition, sometimes mmapstress03 fails due to SEGV. I created a small test program that just does the above mmap(), and depending on the distro and what else I print later it crashes with a SEGV, too. Probably this happens because the mmap() did succeed, and corrupted some existing mappings, cfr. the notes for MAP_FIXED: MAP_FIXED Don’t interpret addr as a hint: place the mapping at exactly that address. addr must be a multiple of the page size. If the memory region specified by addr and len overlaps pages of any existing mapping(s), then the overlapped part of the existing mapping(s) will be discarded. If the specified address cannot be used, mmap() will fail. Because requiring a fixed address for a mapping is less portable, the use of this option is dis‐ couraged. JFYI, with 64-bit userland, this boils down to: | mmap addr 0x7fffffffffff0000 size 0x7fffffffffff0000 | mmap returned 0xffffffffffffffff i.e. mmap() fails as expected, and the test succeeds. Does all of this sound OK? Thanks for your comments! With kind regards, Geert Uytterhoeven Software Architect Techsoft Centre Technology and Software Centre Europe The Corporate Village · Da Vincilaan 7-D1 · B-1935 Zaventem · Belgium Phone: +32 (0)2 700 8453 Fax: +32 (0)2 700 8622 E-mail: geert.uytterhoe...@sonycom.com Internet: http://www.sony-europe.com/ A division of Sony Europe (Belgium) N.V. VAT BE 0413.825.160 · RPR Brussels Fortis · BIC GEBABEBB · IBAN BE41293037680010 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev