On Sep 11, 2009, at 6:47 AM, Aggrwal Poonam-B10812 wrote:
Ok, I wrongly understood protected interrupts as reserved for
one core. However, I still dislike two devices having the same name.
Otherwise it may work if every interrupt is delivered to both
cores although statistically only one core will actually have
some work to do. Doesn't the kernel complain about unhandled
irqs however?
We don't see any such messages of unhandled interrupts, although I
checked the corresponding files for mpc8572ds, they do not have the
interrupts property for the serial ports at all, in both the core0 and
core1 dts.
Don't know the reason.
the p2020 versions shouldn't have an interrupt property in the serial
node. The reason we removed it in the 8572 CAMP dts is to make sure
we get polling mode. As Gabriel points out sharing the IRQ between
the two OSes is not safe. While it might seem to work it will have
issues at some point.
- k
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
