On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 18:45 +0200, Albrecht Dreß wrote: > Am 11.06.09 19:28 schrieb(en) Grant Likely: > > So; the solution to me seems to be on an MPC5200 platform replace the > > offending hooks with MPC5200 specific variants at runtime. > > Will re-work the patch that way! BTW, a dumb question: what is the > proper way to determine which cpu the system is running on? Check the > CPU node of the of tree?
Surely the solution is for it to be a 'complex' mapping, where it can provide its own I/O functions instead of polluting the inline versions designed for 'simple' maps with special cases? -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
