On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 10:15 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 17:05 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 23:51 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > From: Michel Dänzer <daen...@vmware.com> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <daen...@vmware.com> > > > --- > > > > Hi Michel ! > > > > While your two previous patches apply just fine, this one doesn't, > > the uninorth_insert_memory() function seems to be slightly different > > upstream. Does this depend on some separate yet unapplied patches ? > > I previously sent the attached patches to Dave in the course of the > radeon KMS issues thread. Not sure which of these he's picked up yet, if > any.
I merged the first two patches in your series, we can sort out the 3rd one in a second pass on the merge window. Cheers, Ben. > > > I'm putting 1/3 and 2/3 into my -test branch and they should hit my > > -next branch in a couple of days. > > > > Or do you prefer us to merge that via Dave ? > > > > The thing is, stuff in -powerpc is much more likely to get some amount > > of testing on actual ppc hardware than stuff in random other trees :-) > > I'm fine with either way. > > _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
