On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:38:06 +0100 David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: > > > > which implies to me that spin_is_locked() will always return false. Is > > > this > > > expected behavior. > > > > That's wrong. spin_is_locked should always return true on UP. > > Surely it's not that simple? Maybe spin_is_lock() should be undefined on UP. That would lead to a lot of #ifdef CONFIG_SMP #endif in drivers because there is driver code that uses spin_is_locked() in fairly sensible fashion when dealing with locking. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
