On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 11:25 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Very lightly tested, doesn't crash the kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mich...@ellerman.id.au> > --- > > It doesn't look like we actually need to add any support in the > arch code - or is there something I'm missing?
Hmm, I think we want to add annotations in lib/lmb.c don't we? That's
our low-level pre-bootmem allocator.
And we have the same problem with _edata as x86.
And I'm seeing lots (~250) of these:
unreferenced object 0xc0000000fcd2e2f0 (size 16):
comm "swapper", pid 1, jiffies 4294892393
backtrace:
[<c00000000014d9c0>] .create_object+0x164/0x2a8
[<c00000000014dc94>] .kmemleak_alloc+0x74/0x120
[<c0000000001474d0>] .__kmalloc+0x20c/0x2ac
[<c00000000036998c>] .kvasprintf+0x64/0xb0
[<c000000000360558>] .kobject_set_name_vargs+0x44/0xb4
[<c0000000003f06d0>] .dev_set_name+0x50/0x6c
[<c00000000042a794>] .scsi_sysfs_device_initialize+0xd0/0x16c
[<c000000000426600>] .scsi_alloc_sdev+0x1c4/0x284
[<c000000000426b50>] .scsi_probe_and_add_lun+0x144/0xbd4
[<c0000000004279bc>] .__scsi_scan_target+0xfc/0x658
[<c000000000427f90>] .scsi_scan_channel+0x78/0xe8
[<c0000000004280cc>] .scsi_scan_host_selected+0xcc/0x154
[<c00000000042823c>] .do_scsi_scan_host+0xe8/0x10c
[<c0000000004286ec>] .scsi_scan_host+0x250/0x294
[<c000000000456ef8>] .ibmvscsi_probe+0x4f8/0x630
[<c000000000027418>] .vio_bus_probe+0x360/0x3cc
cheers
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
