On Wednesday 24 June 2009, Steven A. Falco wrote: > Your changes to bitbang_work look good.
You tested? > I'm not clear on why you first set do_setup = -1 but later > use do_setup = 1. Perhaps they should both be "1". Other than that, > > Acked-by: Steven A. Falco <sfa...@harris.com> The "-1" is for the init path, "1" for per-transfer overrides; this way it avoids some extra calls to set up the bits/speed. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
