On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 07:06:18PM +0200, Lorenz Kolb wrote: > Could you please try the following patch, I am quite sure that checking > for > 4 was accidentially done within io.c instead of >= 4 as if it's 4 > we still can copy a 32-bit word. Some hardware might not be happy about > 8-bit accesses...
There seems to be desire for this fix: http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-May/072582.html If it works here, too, then you could maybe also ack it? BTW, I can't find the original patch in patchwork, maybe the patch was missed because of that? Regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
