Ira Snyder wrote:
So, I see a couple of ways of moving forward:
1) Keep my implementation, moving the includes to arch/powerpc/include.
   Do we drop the allocation functions?

+1 for option 1. Having it under arch/powerpc/include makes it clear that it is a powerpc specific api, so keep the allocation routines. Copy Kumar on the updated patch as I'll need a ppc-dev ack for carrying this file addition through the dmaengine tree.

Thanks for all the input Dan. I finally feel like we're getting
somewhere :)

Thanks for the exchange it always helps to get a good picture of the underlying design rationale.

Regards,
Dan
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to