On Jun 17, 2009, at 6:50 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype b/arch/powerpc/
platforms/Kconfig.cputype
index cca6b4f..dd9f3ec 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
config PPC64
bool "64-bit kernel"
default n
- select HAVE_PERF_COUNTERS
+ select PPC_HAVE_PMU_SUPPORT
help
This option selects whether a 32-bit or a 64-bit kernel
will be built.
@@ -243,6 +243,15 @@ config VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING
If in doubt, say Y here.
+config PPC_HAVE_PMU_SUPPORT
+ bool
what does this mean?
+
+config PPC_PERF_CTRS
+ def_bool y
+ depends on PERF_COUNTERS && PPC_HAVE_PMU_SUPPORT
+ help
+ This enables the powerpc-specific perf_counter back-end.
Can we distinguish between the two different architected perf counters
programming models to start with. Maybe something like:
PPC_BOOK3S_PERF_CTRS and PPC_BOOK3E_PERF_CTRS (or
PPC_SERVER_PERF_CTRS / PPC_EMB_PERF_CTRS)
+
config SMP
depends on PPC_STD_MMU || FSL_BOOKE
bool "Symmetric multi-processing support"
--
1.6.0.4
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
