Am 16.06.09 14:53 schrieb(en) Grant Likely:
I'm not happy about the use case though. It probably shouldn't appear in this binding, or if it does it should be tagged as an optional property.
I agree with you that the naming is really misleading - other devices which are not mtd's may suffer from the same problem of the lpb (in my case, I have an extra memory-mapped Ethernet chip which I didn't try to access yet...).
As it is actually a chip select property, what about defining an optional property like "cs-width = (8|16|32)" which defaults to 8 and may be added to each 5200 lpb child?
It is only in the 5200 localplus case that bank-width is needed to figure out how to apply the workaround.
Just out of curiosity: what about the "localbus" of other Freescale chips (82xx? 83xx? Maybe others?)?
Thanks, Albrecht.
pgpLbC13BupnH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
