On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 16:11 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Maybe. But maybe it's representative... so far in this merge > > window, 100% of the powerpc build and runtime breakage upstream > > comes from stuff that didn't get into -next before. > > But that's axiomatic, isnt it? linux-next build-tests PowerPC as the > first in the row of tests - so no change that was in linux-next can > ever cause a build failure on PowerPC, right?
I'd have to check with Stephen but I think linux-next tests a whole bunch of archs each round. Anyway, the idea is, just don't get things upstream before the at least had a chance to go through that little bit of integration testing .. Is it -that- hard ? Oh and before you ask me, yes, I do the same mistakes, and I have been caught too merging things at the last minute that ended up broken and that could have been caught by -next... I'm just trying to advocate the idea that we all try to improve in that area :-) Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
