On Wednesday 27 May 2009 01:38:34 Kim Phillips wrote: > > > If others would prefer standardizing on uppercase, I can submit new > > > patches for 85xx, 5xxx, 86xx, etc. This would be still be inconsistent > > > with Linux though, which is a bit annoying. > > > > It seems Linux uses 8?xx with very few exceptions (CONFIG_SND_VIA82XX* > > and CONFIG_EDAC_MPC85XX), so let's do the same here. > > so linux is inconsistent too. > > I'm a fan of a more self-consistent CONFIG_MPC85XX_MDS over mixed-case > names like linux' CONFIG_MPC85xx_MDS. > > I wonder if the linux ppc guys would accept a > s/CONFIG_MPC8?xx/CONFIG_MPC8?XX/g rename patch for linux...
Just to add my 0.02$ as well, I prefer the lower case version CONFIG_8?xx. It's used for 4xx this way as well in Linux and U-Boot. Perhaps I'm just used to reading it this way... Best regards, Stefan ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: off...@denx.de ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
