On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 09:25 -0700, Stephen Neuendorffer wrote: > I agree that something is called for... The first might be slightly > simpler, since it would probably transparently deal with the presence > of more than one PLB->PCI bridge?
The current code doesn't already ? Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
