David Miller writes: > I fully expected us to be, at this point, talking about putting the > pending softirq check back into the trap return path :-/
Would that actually do any good, in the case where the system has decided that ksoftirqd is handling soft irqs at the moment? Paul. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev