> >> The best alternative to creating the device tree dynamically would > >> be to > >> append the devicetree to the bitimage in a way the boot loader could > >> always find it. > >> > > > > That sounds like a good solution to me. > > > I am glad you like it. If Xilinx would like to offer any advice as > to how to prepend a device tree to the end of a bit file without > foreclosing any of their future plans or .... I would be happy to > look at implementing it.
There are options here... For the benefit of the mailing list: they are tied into how the FPGA configuration is loaded, and the particular FPGA family. By far the most portable/generic option is to simply use an initialized BRAM for this. David: If you would like to have a discussion regarding particular design tradeoffs, I'd be happy to, but since I doubt there is anyone on this list who is interested in the vagaries of FPGA configuration methods, I suggest we have the discussion privately. Steve This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be proprietary, privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email message or any attachments. Delete this email message and any attachments immediately. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
