> > The soft irq stuff is pretty much all generic code these days, except > > for the code to switch to the softirq stack. > > Grumble, when did that happen :-( > > That's horrible for latency compared to handling it directly > in the trap return path.
If it is indeed such a problem, it would be reasonably easy to handle it in the return-to-userspace path around the same place where we test for pending signals (isn't what we used to do anyway ?) Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
