On Fri, 1 May 2009 03:48:33 +0400
Anton Vorontsov <avoront...@ru.mvista.com> wrote:

> Since we renamed the file, we might want to rename the file
> internals too.
> 
> Though we don't bother with changing platform driver name and
> platform module alias. The stuff is legacy and hopefully we'll
> remove it soon.
> 

but but but

>
> -static struct of_platform_driver of_mpc83xx_spi_driver = {
> -     .name           = "mpc83xx_spi",
> -     .match_table    = of_mpc83xx_spi_match,
> -     .probe          = of_mpc83xx_spi_probe,
> -     .remove         = __devexit_p(of_mpc83xx_spi_remove),
> +static struct of_platform_driver of_mpc8xxx_spi_driver = {
> +     .name           = "mpc8xxx_spi",
> +     .match_table    = of_mpc8xxx_spi_match,
> +     .probe          = of_mpc8xxx_spi_probe,
> +     .remove         = __devexit_p(of_mpc8xxx_spi_remove),
>  };

It _did_ change the platform driver name, didn't it?


This patch series had quite a lot of conflicts with the already-pending

spi-move-common-spi_setup-functionality-into-core.patch
spi-move-more-spi_setup-functionality-into-core.patch

which I beleive I successfully fixed up.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to