in the case the QE has 46 SNUMs for the threads to support four UCC Ethernet at
1000Base-T simultaneously.

Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang <haiying.w...@freescale.com>
---
v2 change: Add comments for the Rx threads change.
 drivers/net/ucc_geth.c |   10 +++++++++-
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c b/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c
index 44f8392..1cb2710 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c
@@ -3702,7 +3702,15 @@ static int ucc_geth_probe(struct of_device* ofdev, const 
struct of_device_id *ma
                ug_info->uf_info.utfet = UCC_GETH_UTFET_GIGA_INIT;
                ug_info->uf_info.utftt = UCC_GETH_UTFTT_GIGA_INIT;
                ug_info->numThreadsTx = UCC_GETH_NUM_OF_THREADS_4;
-               ug_info->numThreadsRx = UCC_GETH_NUM_OF_THREADS_4;
+
+               /* If QE's snum number is 46 which means we need to support
+                * 4 UECs at 1000Base-T simultaneously, we need to allocate
+                * more Threads to Rx.
+                */
+               if (qe_get_num_of_snums() == 46)
+                       ug_info->numThreadsRx = UCC_GETH_NUM_OF_THREADS_6;
+               else
+                       ug_info->numThreadsRx = UCC_GETH_NUM_OF_THREADS_4;
        }
 
        if (netif_msg_probe(&debug))
-- 
1.6.0.2

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to