We shouldn't directly access sysdata to get the pci_controller.  Instead
use pci_bus_to_host() for this purpose.  In the future we might have
sysdata be a device_node to match ppc64 and unify the code between ppc32
& ppc64.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/sysdev/tsi108_pci.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/tsi108_pci.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/tsi108_pci.c
index 24e1f5a..cf244a4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/tsi108_pci.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/tsi108_pci.c
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ tsi108_direct_write_config(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int 
devfunc,
                           int offset, int len, u32 val)
 {
        volatile unsigned char *cfg_addr;
-       struct pci_controller *hose = bus->sysdata;
+       struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
 
        if (ppc_md.pci_exclude_device)
                if (ppc_md.pci_exclude_device(hose, bus->number, devfunc))
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ tsi108_direct_read_config(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int 
devfn, int offset,
                          int len, u32 * val)
 {
        volatile unsigned char *cfg_addr;
-       struct pci_controller *hose = bus->sysdata;
+       struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
        u32 temp;
 
        if (ppc_md.pci_exclude_device)
-- 
1.6.0.6

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to