On Apr 29, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Haiying Wang wrote:

Change the RISC allocation to macros instead of enum, add function to read the number of risc engines from the new property "num-riscs" under qe node in dts.
Add new property "num-riscs" description in qe.txt

Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang <haiying.w...@freescale.com>
---
.../powerpc/dts-bindings/fsl/cpm_qe/qe.txt         |    1 +
arch/powerpc/include/asm/qe.h                      |   18 ++++++++----
arch/powerpc/sysdev/qe_lib/qe.c | 28 +++++++++++ +++++++++
3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

I'm wondering if these should be fsl,num-riscs or fsl,qe-num-riscs since its a new property. Ditto for num-snums.

Also, shouldn't both of these be in the Required section of the binding.

- k
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to