Paul Mackerras wrote:
Sorry about that.Mike Mason writes:diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_driver.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_driver.c index 380420f..9a2a6e3 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_driver.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_driver.c @@ -182,6 +182,8 @@ static void eeh_report_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, void *userdata) if (!driver) return;+ dev->error_state = pci_channel_io_normal; + eeh_enable_irq(dev); if (!driver->err_handler ||Your mail client totally mangled the whitespace. I fixed it up and applied it, since the patch was small, but in future please fix your mail client so it doesn't do that. Maybe. The only drivers that care at this point are the emulex and qlogic drivers with native eeh support. How far back would you typically apply a patch like this? I'm submitting it for inclusion in SLES 10 & 11 and RHEL 5.It sounds like this patch needs to be applied to earlier kernel versions -- do you agree? Mike Paul. |
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev