On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Hugh Dickins writes: > > > Now that shmem's divisions by zero and SHMEM_MAX_BYTES are fixed, > > let powerpc 256kB pages coexist with CONFIG_SHMEM again. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <h...@veritas.com> > > --- > > Added linuxppc-dev and some other Cc's for this 3/3: sorry > > if you didn't see 1/3 and 2/3, they were just in mm/shmem.c. > > Looks OK - what path are you using to get the series upstream? > (I.e. should I be putting 3/3 in the powerpc tree or are you going to > push it along with the others?)
If it's OK with you (and you're saying it is), I think the best would be for it to sit alongside 1/3 and 2/3 in Andrew's tree, hopefully get an Ack from Yuri (I don't have any powerpc 256kB pages myself to test it fully), and then go on into 2.6.30. Hugh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
